Skip to Content

NEA President: Reauthorization 'Blueprint' Disappointing


By Cynthia McCabe

March 13, 2010 -- The White House this weekend unveiled its proposal for reauthorizing the Bush administration's No Child Left Behind law but the result is a disappointing outline for more of the same focus on testing. As a result, the NEA cannot support the plan as released, President Dennis Van Roekel said.

The Obama administration's "blueprint" for reauthorization adds to the already weighty bureaucracy of NCLB and overlays its own "Race to the Top" program, which forces states to compete for funding. It replaces the old law's requirement that all children be proficient in reading and math with one that all students graduate prepared for higher education and the workforce.

Largely missing is the input that educators around the country delivered to the administration when it took a listening tour from city to city to hear about the inequities and other problems wrought by No Child Left Behind.

"We were expecting to see a much broader effort to truly transform public education for kids," Van Roekel said after reviewing the proposal. "Instead, this blueprint’s accountability system still relies on standardized tests to identify winners and losers. We were expecting more funding stability to enable states to meet higher expectations. Instead, this blueprint requires states to compete for critical resources, setting up another winners-and-losers scenario. We were expecting school turnaround efforts to be research-based and fully collaborative. Instead, we see too much top-down scapegoating of teachers and not enough collaboration."

Left out of the Obama administration's proposal for reform are students' first teachers -- their parents. Van Roekel said there is no attempt in the blueprint to support parents' efforts to be more involved in their children's education.

“The public knows that struggling schools need a wide range of targeted actions to ensure they succeed, and yet the administration’s plan continues to call for prescriptions before the actual problems are diagnosed," he said. "We need proven answers along with the deep insight of the experienced professionals who actually work in schools."

NEA believes the reauthorized Elementary and Secondary Education Act must focus on policies that would help transform public schools into high-quality learning centers by recognizing the shared responsibility among local, state, and federal governments. The Association encourages Congress to listen to the voices of educators in developing legislative proposals and offers these principles for ESEA reauthorization:

. The federal government should serve as a partner to support state efforts to transform public schools. 
. A revamped accountability system must correctly identify schools in need of assistance and provide a system of effective interventions to help them succeed. 
. The federal government should respect the profession of teachers and education support professionals by providing supports and resources to help students succeed. 
. The federal government should require states to detail how they will remedy inequities in educational tools, opportunities and resources.   
. State and local collective bargaining for school employees must be respected.
. Targeted programs that support students and schools with unique needs—such as English Language Acquisition, Impact Aid, rural schools and Indian education—should be maintained and expanded.
. The federal government should serve as a research clearinghouse, making available to educators a wealth of knowledge about how best to teach students and help schools improve practices.

Starting immediately, NEA leadership will share the reauthorization blueprint with its 3.2 million members to give them the opportuity to share their opinions with the Administration.

"We intend to engage in a productive dialogue to meet the needs of students, educators and public schools," Van Roekel said.

COMMENTS:

1 - 10 out of 43 Comments |Add your comment

Many schools are failing because children with special needs are held to the flame of teach for the test, take the test, score the test, place the test scores in a row, judge the test, fail the school because, "Hey! Hear this: children with disabilities may be limited in what they can achieve, even with the most magical of teachers!" We love them. We want them to achieve. But we can only do so much.

If this administration continues this approach to education, public education will cease to exist. This might satisfy those who embrace annihilation as a solution, but what it really means is that Democrats and Republicans have linked arms in the destruction of our profession all the while professing to be "reformers." George Orwell could not improve on this travesty.

I started teaching in 1979, and have seen teaching go from a profession that valued individual teacher's skills to one that wants a "cookie cutter" type of plan to teach students. It's as if the districts don't trust us to be professionals and know what our students need. Now everyone is expected to teach the same thing the same way. I think morale for teachers in general the lowest I have ever seen. All thanks to NCLB. Now the new plan that the Obama administration has come up with offers more of the same testing, testing testing. Teachers know it doesn't help, kids are tired of being over- tested and no one is happy. I never thought I would want to quit teaching, but but I have to say I am getting more and more discouraged about my profession. It's as if all the joy in teaching has been sucked out. And replaced with a test.

I have felt from the beginning that Obama and Duncan have no clue as to what to do with failing schools. As a result, I believe they are just trying to destroy the union just as the republicans have been tearing down the AFL-CIO. I also believe that Obama has been financially influenced by Bill Gates, who is not an educator, but is looking for another profit making scheme to his benefit only. When is the last time you saw Duncan or Gates in a classroom? I also agree with many of the comments expressed here that no one holds parents responsible for what their children do not do in school. I feel that the generation we are seeing today in school are the result of children dumped in day care centers which care nothing for the children but love the $$$ coming in. There is no substitute for good mothering and parenting!!! As a teacher, I cannot be held responsible if Johnny refuses to do his school work or pay attention in school, especially if his parents do not show any interest in his education or reinforce the need to complete homework [Explicit] or to pay attention in school.

obama was a mistake. like grandholm in michigan was a mistake. they get our PAC money and do as they well please. they do not represent me or the views of our union. time to punish them with drastic cuts in PAC funds. let obama try to work with the repubs next time. he is going to nail us again in 2018 when he heavily taxes our heath care benefits (his plan), if we even have benefits by then. merit pay won't even cover our taxes. god help this profession!

I could not agree with your comment any more...it is so true. I have been saying this for over 8 yrs now. Parents need to do their jobs too, the gavernement and parents alike are putting on the blame on the teacher. We work our tails off day in and day out, for what? So Obama and his administration can dictate our salaries based on testing and merit. If someone is willing to be a teacher, that should be MERIT enough!

Without parent accountability, you will never see success. Stop blaming teachers for inadequate parenting!

Here is another reason why I am ending my 14 year career teaching the Social Sciences to some wonderful public high schoolers in Placer County, California. I'm leaving at the end of the school year to take a job at a private non-denominational school who strives at teaching excellence without the pressure of Standardized Testing. It hurts that this is one of my reasons but between the horrible state California is in with public education and then constantly forming our subjects to fit a lawmakers wishlist, is becoming ridiculous. I truly believed the administration would overhaul NCLB but it doesn't look like it at all. It also makes me happy that I'm driving around with the sticker: Don't Blame Me, I Voted for Hillary.

NEA needs to do a better job in this state fighting for teachers. We are expected to work 24\7 as stated in contracts. We must stay after for meetings. Now will be required to do after school activities or we will not be considered at standard teachers. All of this extra after hours work for no pay. When I worked in a state with a strong teacher union we were always compenstated for any after hours work and never asked to stay without compensation. We are expected to produce scores from children who are low performers. They keep putting more and more pressure on us. You can go to other jobs with higher pay and less pressure or the same pressure and I believe teachers are starting to think of doing that. I feel like we are fighting a losing battle with testing. The joy of teaching is leaving the profession. We have so much to teach in one year. We are making them the jack of all trades and masters of none because we do not have time to teach mastery, just teach and move on to the next concept.

I do not believe many teachers are aware of what the Obama Adminstration has just added to NCLB. Forcing states to add more charter schools, not to negotiate with unions and having merit pay. My local union endorsed President Obama when he was running for election, so did most other teacher unions. This legislation is a slap in the face to all public school teachers. The public needs to be aware that the Obama administration is just business as usual in politics and does not care about teachers or students.

Add Your Comment

Please type this text in the box below:

RELATED LINKS

Learn more about NEA's position on the reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act

Read more about how NEA is bringing true reform to schools with the Priority Schools Campaign