RESPECT
Educators have endured budget
cuts, attacks on their qualifications, and a law that shortchanges
kids and schools. Now as Election Day approaches, they want to
know: Will they ever get the respect they deserve?
More...
By Mary Ellen Flannery, Sabrina Holcomb,
and Alain Jehlen
|
 Photo by Photodisc
|
Also in this story...
|
“There is not one educator who wants any child to fail. Not one,” says
Deborah Broxton of Fernandina Beach, Florida. “Treat us like the professionals
we are.”
Broxton teaches in an alternative program for some of the toughest high school
students, many of them violent, in North Florida. And she sums up the feelings
of many NEA members after two years of being told that tens of thousands of
public schools are failing—and that the problem lies largely with them.
It’s not the kind of news that inspires, but then good news about educators
seems in short supply of late. Truth is, these are not feel-good times. The
revamped Elementary and Secondary Education Act, the so-called No Child Left
Behind law (NCLB), spurred not just a reexamination of how America educates
its children, but lots of soul searching among educators about how politicians
regard them. Do politicians really understand the struggles of educators? Do
they appreciate educators’ commitment to one of the most challenging
jobs in America?
As the nation stands poised to pick a new President, NEA members are not so
sure. When asked in an NEA poll last May what education issues were most important
to them in this election, “respect” trumped the list, followed
by the closely related issue: fixing NCLB. It’s a law many members say
is based on the notion that they won’t do their jobs without Washington
standing over their shoulders telling them who, when, and what to test; how
to grade the tests; and what punishments they will suffer when students fall
short.
“There’s total disrespect from the federal level,” said
a Pennsylvania teacher. “It’s as if the last people in the world
you would ask to figure out how to help kids learn are the teachers.”
Fueling that feeling of rejection, members say, is an apparent disregard for
the complicated social issues that make learning—and parent involvement—so
difficult, and a resistance to paying for higher professional salaries and
smaller classes.
“I have a class of 45 kids trying to learn with 12 special ed kids in
there. How is that even remotely possible?” said a young teacher from
Las Vegas, Nevada. “I’ve turned into a babysitter.”
Those who suffer most are students, members say. Discussing the impact of
burgeoning testing requirements, one teacher reported, “I have kindergartners
and first graders saying, ‘I’m stupid.’ That’s heartbreaking.”
Whichever candidate they support, members want our next President to hear
and respect their firsthand knowledge of education.
Here are some of their voices.
“Really poor teachers?!”
 Photo by Steve Pope
|
RESPECT Dennis Linn doesn’t think he’s a failure. And yet,
this summer, the Iowa math teacher received a national Republican Congressional
Committee-sponsored poll in his mailbox asking him, “Why is public education
failing?”
“They listed a bunch of reasons [to check off] but the one that really
got to me was, ‘Really poor teachers,’” Linn recounts. His
response: “If you keep taking money out of the public education system
in your belief that it has already failed, then it really is going to fail.”
This latest mailing from the nation’s capital affirms for Linn that
educators have become the Rodney Dangerfields of professional America. They
get “no respect”—and worse, to use the language of his kids
at Pella High School, they’re “dissed” by those who should
model the nation’s values.
Take the No Child Left Behind law: When it transfers power from local schools
to federal offices, that’s disrespectful, he says. “Pushing issues
and not funding them—that’s disrespectful,” he adds.
In recent years, Linn, a lifelong Republican, has felt that disrespect from
his own political party. It has become near impossible to bring up Iowa State
Education Association ideas at Republican state caucuses, he says.
And so, after 31 years working over math equations, Linn wonders if the current
variables add up to a future in teaching. It’s not that he wants to retire,
but he wonders if public schools can survive the current attitude of disdain.
Even when citizens want more money put in schools, elected officials refuse.
“They say ‘No, that’s not our agenda.’”
The para test: judging what?
 Photo by Cheryl Gerber
|
RESPECT Terri Prough wants the President of the United States to come
see her.
Prough, a special education paraprofessional in LaPlace, Louisiana, a suburb
of New Orleans, has invited several politicians to visit her class, but none
has shown up.
If the President came, she says, “he would realize these children have
serious problems. He would learn that we do a lot more than the people in Washington
think we do. They think we’re stupid. They think they wrote the book
on special education, but they know nothing about it.”
Prough took the ParaPro test to comply with the so-called No Child Left Behind
law. The test covered reading, writing, and math, but “nowhere did it
ask me what I should do with the child who eats chalk, bugs, or anything else
he can shove in the mouth, or the emotionally disturbed child who throws chairs
at other students.”
Prough knows that paras, especially at the high school level, do need academic
skills. “Of course you need an education, but not college-level. A high
school diploma should be enough,” she says.
“Let every school district evaluate their paras by observing them in
the classroom. Does the para treat the children with respect, and follow through
with the teacher’s instructions? Is the para dedicated enough to want
to come back year after year, and willing to do the extra dirty work?”
The testing, says Prough, is a waste of money. “Let them spend that
money on classes for us about how to work with special education kids.”
Left behind in language limbo
 Photo by Peter Zuzga
|
FAIRNESS Jeanne Sanchez-Bell
has students from Mexico, Pakistan, Guatemala, Colombia, Japan, Turkmenistan,
and all corners of the non-English-speaking world. They come to her Mary D.
Bradford High School classroom in Kenosha, Wisconsin, with little English and
spotty school histories.
Some will disappear quickly to work in local factories or care for younger
siblings at home. Others will stay and, after a couple years of classes, can
ask for directions to the bathroom and navigate simple books. At that point
the so-called No Child Left Behind law will demand that they take and pass
standardized reading and math tests in English.
“It’s just impossible,” exclaims Sanchez-Bell.
While her kids may understand how plants rely on sunshine to grown and breathe,
they’ve no idea how “autotrophic life forms” use “electromagnetic
radiation” during “photosynthesis.” Even after an overdue
revision this year, NCLB still expects immigrant students to perform as well
as their native-born peers. When they fail, so do their teachers and schools.
To Sanchez-Bell, a second-generation American and fluent Spanish-speaker,
the federal education law desperately needs fixing (and funding).
Regular rulers won’t work
 Photo by Craig Mitchelldyer
|
FAIRNESS When Michelle, an eighth-grader in Hillsboro, Oregon, first
came to Raymond A.
Brown Middle School, she was sweet and even-tempered—and still is—but,
because she was different from most of her classmates, she didn’t have
any friends.
Now, despite a cognitive disability, she plays cards with buddies, has company
at lunch, and even goes to sleepovers. She’s ready for high school, says
Michelle’s case manager, Patty Craig, while wiping tears from her eyes.
Of course, that kind of progress won’t be noted by any measure of the
No Child Left Behind law. A special education student’s ability to make
friends, use the bathroom, or focus on a teacher can’t be measured by
standardized tests.
And it’s not that tests are bad, Craig says. “I’d like to
see us continue to give tests that are appropriate to kids, but make the focus
their own progress at their own level,” she adds.
Since Craig began her career 12 years ago, it seems testing has been stealing
more and more instruction time from her kids. Each student requires about seven
hours of individualized testing—multiply that by 10 and you’ve
lost two weeks. At the same time, class sizes have skyrocketed and support
services have been cut.
It makes her angry that citizens—from the White House to the neighbor’s
house—don’t seem to realize these burdens. “People in my
building are competent and professional and you’d be amazed at the number
of cars here at 10 p.m.,” Craig says. “But this is compromising
my ability to do my job.”
The top 7 issues facing educators, according to NEA
members*
1 Respect
2 Fixing No Child Left Behind law
3 Parental involvement
4 Increasing federal funding
5 Reducing paperwork
6 Reducing class size
7 Reducing health care costs |
*NEA Member Survey, May 2004
Your marriage or your life
 Photo by Sandy Schaeffer
|
HEALTH CARE Homer Adams wants a President who would save his friends’ marriage.
It may seem a lot to ask, but in this case, their marriage of nearly 50 years
is on the rocks because of our nation’s dysfunctional health care system.
The husband needs expensive medical treatment. The only way he can get it without
losing his home is to put their house in his wife’s name and divorce
her.
“They don’t take their marriage lightly,” says Adams. “The
divorce goes against their fiber and what they feel they stand for as human
beings. But what else can they do?”
The escalating health care crisis is probably the number one domestic political
issue on retirees’ minds because it is so immediate and so threatening.
Adams, chairperson of the Ohio Education Association-Retired, says he is hearing
more and more personal tales of financial disaster because of medical problems.
He himself is diabetic and, in the last two years, his drug co-payments have
ballooned from about $7 a month to nearly $100. The new Medicare prescription
drug benefit was supposed to help, but Adams finds the drug companies have
boosted prices enough to more than make up for the discounts. So Adams and
his friends are worse off than before.
“It galls me that the new law specifically forbids Medicare from trying
to bargain those high prescription drug prices down,” he says. The Veterans
Administration negotiates low drug prices for veterans, but Medicare, he fumes,
is prohibited from bargaining lower prices for seniors.
Lab rats get more room
 Photo by D.J. Meeks
|
CLASS SIZE There’s such a thing as too many living organisms
in the petri dish that science teacher Lyn Slygh calls her classroom. When
it gets crowded—38 students!—she has to change the way she cultivates
little minds.
Fire is out. Instead of asking students to sterilize equipment over a flame,
the Lake Worth High School veteran buys expensive pre-sterilized equipment.
Gas is out. Sadly, even microscopes are difficult to manage. (Try this problem:
38 kids divided by 24 electrical outlets.)
Slygh, who was voted Florida’s best biology teacher by her peers this
year, isn’t about to let the kids suffer. While her colleagues switch
to worksheets, she spends more time on preparation and clean-up, and moves
faster.
“All their hands are up and I’ll just systematically go around
and say, ‘You’re just going to have to wait, I’ll be there
eventually,’” she says.
To grade papers and prepare labs, she arrived to school last year at 8 a.m.
and left 10 hours later. Her largest Advanced Placement class wasn’t
bad, but younger kids… “The bigger the class is, the more kids
think they can get away with.”
Come November, class size—an investment she says would pay off—will
be one of the many issues on Slygh’s mind. (Don’t get her started
on testing. Kids don’t learn to think anymore, she says.)
“You put a rat in a lab cage and they’ve got better conditions,” she
says. “You can only put so many rats in each cage, and then you regulate
the temperature and fix things when they break.”
Making do
 Photo by Stacy Edmonds
|
FUNDING During the winter months, many of the kids in Vaughn Spencer’s
eighth-grade social studies classroom wear their coats inside because the boilers
aren’t always working. By August, the same kids are sweltering because
the school can’t afford air-conditioning.
Like many urban schools, Southern Middle School in Reading, Pennsylvania,
has a scarcity of commodities and a surplus of challenges: aging buildings,
lack of funds, high teacher turnover, and a large percentage of non-English-speaking
students.
“Right now, urban schools are carrying the weight of NCLB because we’re
the ones who lack the funds but who have the numbers,” says Spencer.
The “numbers” are the student subgroups—including English-language
learners and low-income students—whose scores are make or break under
the federal law. Because of their low scores, Spencer’s school and five
others locally have been targeted by NCLB. In response, the district has filed
a suit against the state, claiming that it has an unfair burden compared to
surrounding suburban districts.
“The irony is that NCLB is hurting the very kids it was supposed to
help,” says Spencer. “We no longer have the time to introduce our
kids to experiences outside of their daily environment—experiences their
suburban counterparts take for granted.”
Activities at Southern Middle School now center on raising test scores. Teachers
have fewer planning periods and there is little or no time for field trips
or the interactive projects the students love and that help make the curriculum
meaningful to them.
“We’re the second poorest school district in the state and we’re
underfunded,” says Spencer, “but we’re still expected to
come through.”
Not worth a dime?
 Photo by Alan Smith
|
FUNDING Minneapolis English teacher Opal
Ehalt is in the front ranks of the fight to “leave no child behind,” and
she’s wondering
why the President wants to cut her loose. Ehalt works with students who are
as likely to be left behind as anyone—teen parents, 80 percent of them
on public assistance, many from families that have been on welfare for generations.
Her project is funded by one of the 38 education programs zeroed out in the
Bush Administration education budget for next year. The Administration tried
to ax it this year, but Congress restored half of the money.
Ehalt says many of her students’ families move frequently, so they disappear
from school records. Under the so-called No Child Left Behind law, there’s
an incentive for schools not to find them because they might drag down a school’s
test scores.
But she and her colleagues simply won’t give up on these students. One
strategy is to connect school and work, making school directly relevant to
the students’ lives. For example, there’s a chef training project
in which students cook for the soup kitchen run by the church next door.
Ehalt is adding a high-tech strand to the program, putting courses online,
adding chat rooms, and teaching 21st century computer skills.
“One of my girls designed her own Web page including music. She’s
headed for college,” Ehalt reports. The federal dollars in this program
do double duty because each young mom pulled out of poverty brings her baby
along with her.
So how about some help?
And if THAT’S Not Enough…
You Can Become a Party Person
No, not the kind that parties at the nightclub with a drink in each hand and
confetti in the hair. We’re talking about the kind that parties at the
Republican or Democratic national conventions with a flag in each hand and
confetti in the hair. For NEA members Jerry Roe and Karla Bradley, and the
thousands of other delegates that attend the RNC and DNC, democracy is a participatory
business.
RNC in the House
 Photo by Sandy Schaeffer
|
“Educators are more involved in politics than they’ve ever been
before,” says Jerry Roe, an American political systems professor and
alternate Michigan delegate to this year’s Republican National Convention. “Teachers
are out there running for office, serving as precinct delegates, and working
on party committees. We have a profound influence, inside and outside of the
classroom. The message we give our students is that all Americans have a stake
in the political system, no matter what their beliefs.”
Roe, who has been active in Republican politics for years, has sage advice
for aspiring activists—those who campaign from their couch and computer
and those who hit the trail:
IF YOU’RE A HOMEBODY, BE PROACTIVE. Read and watch the news and write
letters to the editor and members of the legislature and Congress. Be informed
so you can discuss the issues.
IF YOU’RE A BUDDING POLITICIAN, JUMP INTO THE FRAY. Make your voice
heard and be a part of the group that makes decisions.
DNC in the House
 Photo by Sandy Schaeffer
|
Karla Bradley, elementary school teacher and First Vice Chair of the Democratic
party of Arkansas, wants her fellow educators to know they have more clout
than they realize. A super delegate to this year’s Democratic National
Convention, Bradley enjoyed hearing Senator Kerry’s sister, a teacher,
speak about education. “Teachers don’t realize how important we
are politically,” says Bradley. “We have the ear of policy makers
and the respect of parents.”
Bradley believes that educators are the perfect candidates for political activism
because a combination of service and idealism is what brings them to the profession.
Who has time for political action? you ask. Bradley offers guidance to both
ardent and armchair activists:
SUPPORT CANDIDATES YOU REALLY BELIEVE IN. Even if they’re not perfect,
you have a chance to make them better.
TAKE NOTHING FOR GRANTED—NOT EVEN THE BASICS. Make sure you, your family,
your friends, and your co-workers are registered to vote. If possible, cast
an early ballot.
—Sabrina
Holcomb
School House to State House
Sometimes you think, “If I were in charge…”
Well, what if you were calling the political shots? “I figure the person
who can best represent me is me,” says Earnest “Coach” Williams,
a physical education teacher—and two-term representative in Georgia’s
House of Representatives. So go for it! Running for office just takes a little
drive, a little cash, and “a friendly smile helps too,” Williams
says.
 Illustrations by Stuart Goldenberg
|
Judy Solano was eating at a Benihana restaurant when she realized she couldn’t
take it anymore. She’d been chatting with a nearby mom about her obviously
precocious 6-year-old son, and recalls saying, “He must just love school.”
He hates it, the mom told her. His classroom work wasn’t creative or
engaging—it was just test preparation all day. They fought every morning
to get the little guy onto the school bus.
“We’re killing the love of lifelong learning,” says Solano,
a former Colorado fifth-grade teacher and Democratic candidate for Statehouse. “I
said, ‘Okay, that’s it, I’m doing it.’”
This is Solano’s first foray into politics—and it’s not
easy, she admits. There’s a lot of self-promotion, which she’s
getting better at, and a lot of asking folks for money, which she still hates.
Still, Solano believes ordinary teachers have to get involved. “People
in the Legislature who don’t know anything about education are making
decisions for educators. It’s time for us to be more politically involved.”
Thirty-plus years after George McGovern’s failed bid for the presidency,
retired librarian Ted Kneebone remains a fan of his fellow South Dakotan. “McGovern
is still a saint….He showed you can win, even if you don’t win.”
Nonetheless, Kneebone does plan to win, even as he takes on a 10-year Statehouse
incumbent in his first run for office. And then, when he gets to Pierre, he
plans on making a little noise.
Take the so-called No Child Left Behind law—in fact, take it all the
way back to Washington. “It’s a vicious, nasty attack on teachers…obviously
cooked up by somebody who doesn’t know anything about education,” he
says. “It’s time for us to say we don’t need the money.”
Although his name has never been on the ballot before, Kneebone has been active
in Democratic politics for decades. He signed up for the union in 1955, and
remembers marching for civil rights with his 8-year-old son a decade later. “When
my ox gets gored, I’ve got to fight back,” he says.
You might think the statehouse and schoolhouse are worlds apart. Not true,
says Donna Sweaney, an elementary school guidance counselor running for a fifth
term in the Vermont Legislature.
“There’s not much difference between elementary and the Legislature,” Sweaney
laughs. “My first impression was these people haven’t learned to
listen to each other—and that’s exactly what I teach the kids to
do.”
Still, Sweaney understands candidacy can be scary—even after years of
local activism, it frightened her too. “Teachers, for the most part,
are more introverted. We go into our classrooms and shut the door,” she
says.
Talk to people with experience, she advises. Accept help from others. When
Sweaney first ran, her friends threw a hugely successful Mexican feast to raise
cash, she recalls.
In Vermont’s Legislature, there are doctors, dentists, lawyers, and
loggers, but there should be teachers too. “I can be a voice on the House
floor who says, ‘Wait a minute, what do you want us to do now? And what
do you want us not to do?’”
Last year, on the first day of school, fourth-grade teacher Theresa Dudley
had 42 kids in her class. After another teacher came on board, she had 29—but
lunch still started at 10 a.m. and the media center was constantly overwhelmed,
she says.
“When we had our union meeting, I stood up and asked, ‘Why are
we supporting candidates that do nothing about growth?’” Dudley
recalls. Maryland voters deserved an alternative, she decided.
“Democracy is healthy when it’s challenged,” she says.
For Dudley, that also means taking aim at the No Child Left Behind law, so
that it returns some responsibility to parents. “They’re hitting
us over the head…and then kids show up without their homework. Parents
have a job to do too,” she says.
Being a Green Party candidate for U.S. Congress doesn’t mean you automatically
get a lot of that, well, green stuff. But you can campaign cheaply by knocking
on doors and introducing yourself in person, she says. And, she hopes, cheap
is effective. “Ask me on election night,” she says, laughing.
Five years ago, Steve Smylie was sitting at a picnic table, “belly-aching
about the latest actions of the Idaho Legislature,” when a friend said
to him, “Funny, I don’t see your name on the ballot.”
“Basically, it was put up or shut up,” Smylie recalls.
He put up.
Smylie, a junior-high history and Spanish teacher, hopes to keep his seat
in Boise this year, where he’s one of seven NEA members in the Legislature.
A good run just requires “connections, connections, connections,” says
Smylie, a Republican and the son of a former Idaho governor.
Being a teacher helps that way, he says. In some neighborhoods, “they
all know Mr. Smylie….I can’t tell you how many times I’ve
bumped into former students, who’ve become some of my strongest volunteers.”
But at the same time, Smylie is wary of being pigeonholed as “The Teacher,” he
says. “You’re generally not effective if you stand up and say ‘I’m
speaking for all my fellow teachers.’ What I’ve found is a lot
of my colleagues quietly come to me.”
When Tammy Starnes picked out signs, she chose an apple and a cute message, “Dedicated
to the core.” And when she met voters, she gave them packages of Chex
Mix that said, “Check the box for Starnes!”
“That was probably a teacher thing,” Starnes laughs.
Considering this is her first campaign, it makes sense that Starnes, a former
fourth-grade teacher who works for the state education department, still feels
more like a teacher than a politician. Soon, she’ll also feel like Autauga
County, Alabama’s newest school board member. With the promise of more
equitable hiring and a teacher recognition program, Starnes won the Republican
primary in July and faces no more opposition.
“[The campaign] was stressful and hot, but it was actually fun,” Starnes
says. Like most teachers, she’s comfortable “talking to whomever,” and
cash wasn’t a big issue after family members chipped in for the $2,500
campaign.
Now Starnes hopes she inspires other teachers to run. “I hope educators
see this and won’t be fearful about standing up for themselves.”
Dale Stephens has driven a school bus for 25 years, which is also about the
length of his political career. He first ran for office at the advanced age
of 24.
“I lost by 97 votes and then I ran again and lost by six votes. And
then I swore I’d never do it again,” Stephens chuckles. And yet,
here he is, talking
to local vets at the VFW Post, and hoping to regain the Statehouse seat he
lost two years ago.
The tireless activist knows firsthand the effect of state budgets on local
finances—teachers here haven’t had a raise in two years—and
he can throw in a savvy two-cents on educational and workplace issues.
Still, it’s not easy. During his first year in office, he spent 134
days in the Capitol. “Do you have family? Business obligations?” he
asks. It’s a part-time job that doesn’t feel like one—but
his school-district employer often appreciates his role. “They know I’ll
sit down with them.”
It took four or five years, but Connecticut State Rep. Ken Green finally convinced
his colleagues in 2001 to boost the dropout age to 18, making it more difficult
for his students to disappear without their diplomas.
“They weren’t seeing the future. They were saying, ‘I’m
16 and I’m outta here,’” Green recalls. But now, with few
exceptions, they’re forced to grow more mature before making that decision.
When you’re a school social worker like Green, you bring real-life experience
to the House floor. “It’s not research that I’ve done or
statistics I’ve gathered, it’s my real life,” he says.
Offering that perspective “is our civic responsibility,” says
Green, a Democrat. And, not only that, it shows students that activism is appropriate.
This year, Green has a few new battles. For one thing, the state needs to
do more to encourage diversity among teachers—like a program to help
classroom a
|