Should students be required to wear seat belts on
school buses?
[YES]
Over a decade of study has shown me that seat restraints on big school buses
are an effective safety device. Professional, medical, and parent associations
want them. The industry opposes them because of cost.
Follow the money: The original school bus safety regulations in the 1970s included
seat belts. Intense pressure from the bus contractors association and school
officials blocked that requirement when the standards were revised in 1977.
The contractors were honest about it. Their February 1976 newsletter said
their organization “wishes to say thanks to all of you for your help,
letters, telegrams, trips to Washington again and again and again. This effort
will save every purchaser of school buses over $300 per bus.”
The industry continues to argue that seat belts don’t make students
safer. But one of many authoritative reports supporting seat belts concluded
that even 50 percent lap belt usage could reduce deaths and injuries up to
20 percent. School buses are very safe as they are, but that 20 percent can
amount to precious lives saved and life-altering injuries averted every year.
Many drivers are against seat belts because they don’t want to be responsible
for making kids belt up and stay belted. Also, they’re afraid the belts
will be used as weapons. I understand that. I’m a veteran driver and
have similar concerns.
But my occasional experience with seat belts does not support this fear.
When the driver has clear authority to refuse to transport any student who
won’t
buckle up and stay buckled, seat belts can help maintain a calm, safe school
bus. Once or twice off the bus and to the office is all it takes to get the
unruly child to comply.
Where transportation providers permit defiant children to ride buses, we
must expect vandalism and misuse of the belts as weapons. The solution is for
districts to back up their drivers and put aides or cameras on buses where
they’re
needed, not to resist seat belts.
James Kraemer has driven a school bus since
1989 in Oregon. He is an active NEA member and founder of 2safeschools.org,
a Web site whose purpose is “to
save one child’s life.”
Cast Your Vote
[NO]
The modern school bus is by far the safest vehicle on the road. In an average
year, there are about seven or eight student fatalities on school buses. That’s
one hundred times less than the number of students who die using other ways
of getting to school: on foot, riding bicycles, or in cars.
Crash data show that belts on buses would give little, if any, added protection.
All modern buses have a built-in safety system called compartmentalization,
mandated by federal motor vehicle safety standards over 20 years ago. It
requires seating with strong, well-anchored, closely spaced, high-backed
seats, padded both in front and back.
Additional arguments against seat belts are many. Students will use the
metal buckles as weapons against other students. Some will even use them
to break bus windows.
Lap belts by themselves are
dangerous. Installing shoulder belts properly requires reworking the interior
of school buses. Many school districts would say this is “much too expensive.”
I have yet to hear of a seat belt arrangement that can be adjusted safely
and swiftly to fit 60-pound elementary school kids and 200-pound high school
football players. Both ride the same buses.
Bus drivers will be expected to enforce seat belt rules. Many students will
not want to wear belts. Even if the driver walks the bus to see that every
student is buckled up, some students will be unbuckled by the time the driver
sits down.
A bus aisle full of loose, dirty seat belts would be a driver’s cleaning
nightmare.
Some kids think it fun to hook belts across the aisle, a major safety hazard
when they get tangled and kids trip over them.
There is a need for seat belts on smaller special education buses. Those
are an entirely separate matter because of fewer riders with special needs.
But seat belts do not belong on the bigger buses.
Frank Hyden has been driving a school bus since 1988, first in Carpentersville
and then in Crystal Lake, Illinois, where he helped organize the bus drivers’ union.
Cast Your Vote
Voting Results
Should teachers allow students to call them by their first names?
The tally on the question in the September issue of NEA Today:
Yes, 44%
No, 56%
Future Debate Questions
NEA Today is looking for NEA members who would like to take part in
our monthly debate.
If you are interested in debating one of the issues listed below,
please send a brief note to Alain Jehlen.
Summarize your position. Include an anecdote or personal observation
to support your case. Give your name, your job (eg, high school math
teacher), and the city or town and the state where
you work.
Possible future debate questions:
- Is character education a waste of time?
- Should we abolish tracking?
- Should teachers permit profanity in student writing?
- Should public schools offer the option of single-sex high schools?
[If not, how about same-gender classes?]
- Should teachers post the names of students who do well on tests or
make honor roll?
- Should students be allowed to drive to school?
Suggest other questions to debate!
|
|