|
Strike Three for Vouchers
Florida In an 8-5-1 decision, the First District Court of Appeal ruled that
a 1999 voucher law, allowing students from struggling public schools to attend
private or religious schools with taxpayer money, violates the state constitution.
This is the third court defeat for the so-called "A+" voucher program.
It's now up to the state Supreme Court to decide if it will review this
case—launched by the Florida Education Association and other pro-public
education groups.
School Funding Suit Pays Off
Montana The Montana Supreme Court ruled that the state's
education finance system is not based on "educationally relevant factors" and
fails to "adequately fund" Montana's public schools. And,
to ice the cake, the court has found the state in violation of its constitution
for showing "no commitment in its education goals to the preservation
of Indian cultural identity." The court-ordered deadline to fix this
mess: October 1.
The lawsuit leading to this decision was filed by the Montana Quality Education
Coalition, which includes MEA-MFT.
A Knockout in Atlantic City
New Jersey For several months last year, state Education Commissioner William
L. Librera blocked a union contract ratified by 700 teachers in the state-monitored
Irvington school district. A big mistake. Irvington Education Association (IEA)
members, backed by legal pressure from the New Jersey Education Association,
wrote to legislators, picketed state Department of Education offices in three
cities, and finally confronted Librera at the NJEA convention in Atlantic City
on November 4.
That faceoff broke the deadlock. On November 15, Librera announced release
of funds to pay for the Irvington contract. Says IEA President Madeline
Edwards, "We were united all the way, and winning was the only acceptable
outcome."
Big District Breaks the Law
Massachusetts In the state's second-largest city, the Massachusetts
Labor Relations Commission (MLRC) found "probable cause" for prohibited
labor practices complaints filed by the Springfield Education Association (SEA)
against the school committee. The MLRC has scheduled formal hearings in February
on the complaints, which charge Springfield negotiators with "regressive" bad-faith
bargaining, unilateral imposition of health care contract provisions, and refusal
to vote on a tentative agreement with SEA.
A State Without Settlements
Michigan In December, the Michigan Education Association reported that 124
of its teacher and education support professional (ESP) bargaining units were
without new contracts for more than a year. Heading the list: teacher and ESP
members of the Lakewood Education Association (LEA), who have been battling
for a new agreement since June 2003. The school board has rejected LEA proposals
that would save the district money in tough fiscal times.
The Lakewood board's own proposal: close elementary schools while granting
the superintendent a 3 percent raise in each of three years.
Sunnier News from the South
Mississippi Members of the Mississippi Association of Educators (MAE) made
their presence felt in the 2004 legislative session through phone calls, e-mails,
letters, and visits to lawmakers. Their hard work won an 8 percent raise for
teachers and assistant teachers and full funding for health insurance costs—with
a $30 million increase. And MAE will keep up the momentum in the 2005 session,
lobbying for everything from full funding of the state education program to
due process for teacher assistants.
Union is Legal on Campus
Washington Professors at Eastern Washington University (EWU)
have become the second faculty group in the state to formally unionize under
a higher education bargaining law passed in 2002. By a margin of 338–46,
the EWU faculty voted in November to let the United Faculty of Eastern (UFE)
continue to represent them in bargaining. Previous contracts were "voluntary" agreements
between UFE and campus administrators; now UFE is the official, legal representative
for Eastern faculty. UFE is affiliated with both NEA and the American Federation
of Teachers.
Shut Up and Sit Down
Alabama Last autumn, Cindy Naylor and other teachers visited a Mobile County
school board meeting to complain about excessive paperwork and student testing.
The teacher applause during Naylor's remarks to the board so angered
board President Lonnie Parsons that he ordered Naylor to stop talking and sit
down. He then called a special meeting for the next morning—when teachers
would be in class.
Helped by the Alabama Education Association, Naylor sued the board, charging
it with violating her free speech rights. Mobile County Circuit Court Judge
Rusty Johnson ordered the board to allow Naylor to appear at its next regular
meeting to finish her remarks. "Speech cannot be curtailed on the mere
basis that others react positively to it," the judge ruled. Says Naylor, "This
proves that my freedom of speech is very, very valuable in this country."
|