Join NEABookstore State Affiliate NEA Today NEA Today
National Education Association: Members & Educators login
NEA Today Home Page Contents to Current Issue of NEA Today Back Issues of NEA Today Send us your feedback NEA Today Forums NEA News
GO!

April 2006

NEA Today Home | April '06 Contents | Archives


Talk Back!
» Contact the Editor
» Share a Story Idea
» Free E-mail Newsletter
» Advertise
Cover Story

Rating NCLB

NEA members say it’s hurting more than helping.

Edited by Alain Jehlen

“NCLB is great in theory. All of us would love to have 100 percent proficiency by 2014. But that’s about as far as it’s great. In Title I schools, we’re losing good teachers. A lot of people are starting to teach to the test, which is awful. The things that we did that made us stand out as teachers are being taken away. Everything is test, test, test.”
—Jessica Cook, third-grade teacher, Anchorage, Alaska

It has one of the most attractive names ever given to a law. It passed amid high bipartisan hopes of closing the wide achievement gaps that divide American children. And at four years old, it now has a track record.

That’s “No Child Left Behind” (NCLB), the current incarnation of the 40-year-old Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).

NCLB touches virtually every school in the country. Each year the impact grows—and so does a new bipartisan consensus that the law is hurting more than helping efforts to close achievement gaps.

Nobody knows the law’s effects on children better than NEA members, so this month, we hear from the experts—that’s you—about both the good and the bad.

This is not idle talk. NEA lobbyists and organizers are working to radically overhaul the law when it comes up for reauthorization in 2007. Congress may start work on changes this year. And educators can make a difference—if they speak up.

To plan the Association’s effort, NEA President Reg Weaver last June appointed an ESEA advisory committee led by Executive Committee member Becky Pringle. They’re holding hearings with members across the country to come up with proposals, rooted in classroom experience, for changing NCLB into a law that would really help achieve the goal of a great public school for every child.

Armed with these proposals, NEA will intensify its campaign to get Congress to listen to the nation’s working educators.

“We’re not talking about tinkering around the edges,” says Pringle. “We are putting together the ideas of NEA members for how the federal government can help us do our work. It’s essential that members get involved if we are to be successful in making the changes that we and our students need in this legislation, which is the most intrusive education law ever to come out of Washington.”

As NEA revs up its push to transform the law, see what some of your colleagues have to say about what NCLB means in their classrooms.

4ways.jpg

“Every Child Can Learn”

Originally, NCLB was supposed to ensure high standards for all children and send the message that no one should give up on students who don’t do well in school. That message mostly got sidetracked by the focus on sanctions. But one school that took the message to heart is Rapid City Central High School, the largest high school in South Dakota. It’s a place that has often intimidated American Indian students, especially those coming from intimate tribal schools. In 2001, the school had 300 American Indian ninth-graders—but only 44 eventually graduated.

onestep.gif
A bipartisan NCLB Commission is considering changes to the law and is collecting stories from educators.
Share your story here!

American Indian and special education students at Central failed to meet adequate yearly progress (AYP) in math and reading, and that got the attention of school leaders, says Robert Cook, who joined the staff of about 100 as its only American Indian teacher three years ago. Cook teaches in the school’s new program for at-risk teens, Lakolkiciyapi (Lakota for “an alliance of people working together”), a school-within-a-school that integrates native culture into the curriculum.

“If they feel a sense of belonging, they’ll look at school as a safe place to be,” says Cook of these students. “We can’t teach kids if they don’t come to school.”

So far, so good—last year, Central’s native students achieved AYP in reading and math, and a record number of them graduated.

A Better Deal for Homeless Students

Buried inside NCLB are clauses that strengthen the 1988 McKinney-Vento law on educating homeless children. Schools must now enroll homeless students immediately, without waiting for records from previous schools. And these students are entitled to stay at the same school even if they move.

One of counselor Rose Mathews’ students at Hunters Lane High School in Nashville feared that if he told anybody his dad had kicked him out, the school would, too. The student lived in his car and then at the Salvation Army before confiding in Mathews.

“Before, it would have been, ‘You can go down the road to the school you’re [now] zoned for,’“ says Mathews. But under the new law, she explains, this student was able to stay at Hunters Lane. “It has made us more aware and put us on alert.”

Using Data To Improve Teaching           

Too much testing can get in the way of learning, but good tests, well used, can be powerful tools. The results they yield can guide teachers in boosting students to a higher level.

It’s all about the data in Deborah Gore’s second-grade classroom in San Bernardino County, California. Her students sharpen their pencils for monthly reading and math assessments. Then the results drive Gore’s instruction. When diagnostic reports show weaknesses in vocabulary, “we talk about words, label them, use them,” Gore says. She also shares data with parents, pointing out ways they can help at home.

Two years ago, her school failed to make AYP, scoring last of 22 schools in its district. But last year, the school soared to sixth.

“Isn’t that awesome?” Gore exclaims. “This really pays off.”

Group Scores Can Pinpoint Problems

On the surface, Calusa Elementary School in tony Boca Raton, Florida, looks highly successful. For the last three years, Calusa has earned an A-ranking from the state based on the scores of its mostly White and affluent students. But there’s a problem at Calusa. Many of the school’s low-income students, more than two-thirds of them Black and Hispanic, do poorly on achievement tests. Their lagging scores used to stay hidden among the piles of answer sheets from more affluent students, but under NCLB, each group’s test results are reported separately. Many NEA members say the separate reporting is helpful when it’s used to point up problems, not to punish educators.

“Disaggregating the data drives our instruction,” says Calusa Elementary third-grade teacher Deborah Fox. “We’re able to prioritize these students’ needs.”

Teachers help craft academic programs to meet the needs of students who score low. “When the results come back at the end of the year and you see these students who had a hard time succeed, that’s very rewarding,” Fox says.

Cover story -  12, 3, 4, 5, next


help   contact us   change your address   sitemap   legal    privacy policy   your california privacy rights   advertise   jobs@nea

© Copyright 2002-2008 National Education Association