|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Guide to Online High School Courses is a product of the National Education Association, Virtual High School, Inc., and American Association of School Administrators, CNA Corporation, IBM Corporation, National Association of State Boards of Education, National School Boards Association, Verizon Communications. Assessing Online High School CoursesBackgroundInformation technology is promoting fundamental changes in how we teach and learn. Barriers of time and place are tumbling as technology offers new choices and opportunities for students and educators. Over the last 20 years or more, American schools have embraced distance learning tools to enhance students' educational opportunities. Satellite, microwave, cable, and broadcast television first gave students access to courses not otherwise available in their home schools. More recently, multimedia Internet-based technologies have provided even more powerful options for teaching and learning at a distance. With virtually all schools now linked to the Internet, states, districts, and individual schools are increasingly adopting online courses to expand their curricula. The appeal of online courses is evident: they can increase the range of course offerings available to all students as well as provide educational access to special students (for example, homebound, incarcerated, and atypical students for whom regular classrooms are not effective). In addition, they provide an alternative method of instruction, one that adults are increasingly using for both professional and personal development. The number of students participating in online courses is large and growing dramatically. One estimate is that 30,000 high school students have taken an online course1 and that another 25,000 students are enrolled in teacher-led online courses this academic year alone. When all kinds of online courses or online options are considered, the number enrolled may be closer to 50,000 or even 100,000. It is estimated that by 2006, a majority of high school students will have had an online course before graduating.2 Why focus on high school courses?By addressing quality measures for online courses offered to high school (grades 9-12) students, this document fills a particular void. Higher education courses and programs have a longer track record and a different set of purposes, administrative practices, and audiences. The characteristics of effective online courses at the college level have recently been identified in such documents as the National Education Association's Quality on the Line3 and the American Federation of Teachers' Distance Education: Guidelines for Good Practice.4 While some of these characteristics also apply to online courses in a high school environment, to be effective there, online courses must address the unique social, educational, and emotional needs of high school students. Since additional limitations and concerns may arise when a significant portion of a high school student's coursework is completed online, we are only establishing criteria for individual courses and not examining online programs that serve as the bulk of a student's education. Another area that raises a series of difficult questions is the appropriateness of online education for younger students. Again, while there are many technical and management issues that cross over and apply to online courses for all age levels, too many important differences exist to automatically apply our criteria in that setting. The research base for online courses and educational programs offered to preschool, elementary school, and middle school students is extremely limited. Our current understanding of the characteristics and needs of learners in earlier grades, however, would suggest we exercise great caution in the use of the online environment to deliver instruction to students prior to middle school. Why are standards needed for online learning?We know that technology can help remove geography and economics as barriers to high educational achievement for every child. Today's challenge is to ensure that information technology increases the quantity of educational opportunities while maintaining or enhancing the quality of those opportunities. Growing experience and analysis of online learning are revealing that new forms of delivery require new quality criteria. Most of our standards for the delivery of instruction never contemplated these new communications tools. Standards and methods that have been studiously crafted to instruct students in physical classrooms cannot simply be double-clicked into an online environment. Our aim in preparing these guidelines is to provide a practical tool to help students, parents, educators, and policymakers create, use, and assess online courses. Our knowledge and savvy in navigating the many online programs available must evolve as quickly as these offerings do. We must make wise decisions in determining when and how to use online education. Most school districts and states have adopted content standards for their students. While these can be applied to both conventional and online programs, they are insufficient guidelines for implementing online programs. Shoehorning content created for conventional classrooms into online delivery will diminish the overall quality of education. It is also important that standards evolve with new goals and opportunities. New skill sets are needed for success in today's information age. These 21st century learning skills have been variously defined5 as:
It is particularly important that educators use tools of the information age -- including online courses -- to build information age skills and understandings. Goals for This DocumentWe believe the standards set forth in this document will facilitate and expand the use of online programs by equipping all those involved in education to make decisions regarding quality online courses. Specifically, we believe that:
We expect these criteria may flex and develop as we learn more, and as information technology functions grow and change. Information technology in education is in its embryonic stages, and these criteria should be a supple, developing tool as we steer through these exhilarating but challenging times. Checklists for Various ConstituenciesEach constituent in the online education process (policymakers, administrators, teachers, parents, and students) must consider a number of important issues when contemplating creating, adopting, administering, or participating in online courses. The checklists that follow are designed to help each constituency ask the right questions. Questions for PolicymakersPlanning for and managing online courses
Personnel questions
Quality control questions
Student enrollment and credit questions
Questions for Online TeachersTeachers of online courses are confronted with a wide range of considerations that affect their work. These cover the gamut of pedagogy, curriculum, assessment, personal style, hardware and software considerations, availability of resources, etc. Teachers should consider these issues as they decide whether they should instruct online, or as they prepare for work in the online environment. Those responsible for administering the implementation of online programs also need to consider these questions in order to design effective learning environments, provide necessary support to teachers, and establish reasonable workloads for the teacher.
Questions for Managers and Administrators of Online CoursesManagers and administrators of online learning programs must consider many of the same issues confronting policymakers and teachers. Managers must ensure availability of adequate resources, reasonable workloads, and ongoing professional support for the practitioners. They must also implement teacher evaluation in a manner that fosters professional growth and supports decisions about teaching assignments. In addition to the practitioner issues, the following are some considerations for the administrator responsible for managing implementation of an online program:
Questions for Parents/GuardiansParents and guardians may be uncomfortable or confused when first considering online courses for their children. The same principles should apply in terms of their oversight of their children's education as in a face-to-face teaching environment, but in online learning there are additional questions to ask the school, their child, and themselves. Parents and guardians should learn as much as possible about the course, teacher, requirements, and supports so they can ensure that the courses provide quality learning experiences for their children.
Questions for StudentsStudents should become informed consumers, learning as much as they can ahead of time regarding the online course and its requirements. Students will need to prepare themselves to take on the additional responsibilities required to be successful in the new environment of online coursework.
A User's Guide to Online CoursesIntroductionClearly, online courses are much like face-to-face courses in that they must meet the highest standards of quality design and instruction. But because the online environment is a relatively new one for teaching and learning, it is important to recognize and explicitly describe key features that should be considered when this form of instruction is adopted. The quality of online course offerings should be considered in terms of the following areas: 1. Curriculum -- Online curricular offerings should be challenging, relevant, and aligned with appropriate national, state, and/or district standards for student learning. 2. Instructional Design -- Online courses should be informed by and reflect the most current research on learning theory. They should be designed to take advantage of the special circumstances, requirements, and opportunities of the online learning environment and support the development of 21st century learning skills. 3. Teacher Quality -- Teachers should be skilled in the subject matter, learning theory, technologies, and teaching pedagogies appropriate for the content area and the online environment. 4. Student Roles -- Students should be actively engaged in the learning process and interact on a regular basis with the teacher and online classmates in the course. 5. Assessment -- Assessment should be authentic, formative, and regular, providing opportunities for students to reflect on their own learning and work quality during the course. End-of-course assessments should give students the opportunity to demonstrate appropriate skills and understandings that reflect mastery of the course content. 6. Management and Support Systems -- The course should be managed to ensure effective student and school participation. Support systems should provide resources to teachers, students, and parents comparable to those provided by face-to-face courses, as well as special support necessitated by the unique circumstances of the online environment. 7. Technological Infrastructure -- Finally, the technical infrastructure supporting the online course should provide the necessary tools for instruction and interactivity. The technology behind the course should work reliably, simply, and economically. Technical assistance should be available whenever needed by students or teachers. Endnotes1 Ball, M., "For an Online High School, the Future Draws Near," The Washington Post, August 23, 2001, p. H19. 2 Rose, R., Director, Concord Consortium, presentation to "Linking Leadership to Learning: Putting PT3 Results to Work," Vanderbilt University, October 20-22, 2001. 3 Phipps, R., Merisotis, J. and Harvey, M. (2000). Quality On the Line: Benchmarks for Success in Internet-based Distance Learning. 4 Higher Education Program and Policy Council. (2001). Distance Education: Guidelines for Good Practice. 5 CEO Forum on Education and Technology. (2001). Key Building Blocks for Student Achievement in the 21st Century, Washington, D.C.: CEO Forum; Lemke, C. (2000) enGauge: 21st Century Skills. Oak Brook, IL; North Central Regional Educational Laboratory; Secretary's Commission on Achieving Necessary Skills, U.S. Department of Labor (1991). What Work Requires of Schools. A SCANS Report for America, 2000.
|
|
|
Printer friendly
|
E-mail
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
help contact us change your address sitemap legal privacy policy your california privacy rights advertise jobs@nea © Copyright 2002-2008 National Education Association ![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||